JN0-664 ACTUAL EXAM TORRENT & JN0-664 PRACTICE MATERIALS & JN0-664 VALID PRACTICE MATERIAL

JN0-664 actual exam torrent & JN0-664 practice materials & JN0-664 valid practice material

JN0-664 actual exam torrent & JN0-664 practice materials & JN0-664 valid practice material

Blog Article

Tags: JN0-664 Valid Test Braindumps, Examinations JN0-664 Actual Questions, New JN0-664 Exam Practice, Trustworthy JN0-664 Pdf, Latest JN0-664 Examprep

The scoring system of our JN0-664 exam torrent absolutely has no problem because it is intelligent and powerful. First of all, our researchers have made lots of efforts to develop the scoring system. So the scoring system of the JN0-664 test answers can stand the test of practicability. Once you have submitted your practice. The scoring system will begin to count your marks of the JN0-664 exam guides quickly and correctly. You just need to wait a few seconds before knowing your scores. The scores are calculated by every question of the JN0-664 Exam guides you have done. So the final results will display how many questions you have answered correctly and mistakenly. You even can directly know the score of every question, which is convenient for you to know the current learning condition.

The JN0-664 exam is a 65-question, multiple-choice exam that can be taken online or at a testing center. JN0-664 exam is rigorous and requires a high degree of knowledge and skill in service provider networking. However, with the right preparation and practice, you can easily pass the exam and earn your certification.

The JN0-664 exam is a highly valued certification for any network professional who wishes to specialize in service provider networks. Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) certification provides professionals with the necessary knowledge and skills to configure, manage, and troubleshoot complex service provider networks. It also helps professionals to demonstrate their expertise in Junos OS and related platforms. Passing the JN0-664 Exam is a significant achievement and can open up several career opportunities in the service provider industry.

>> JN0-664 Valid Test Braindumps <<

Examinations JN0-664 Actual Questions, New JN0-664 Exam Practice

The TestPassKing Juniper JN0-664 exam questions are being offered in three different formats. These formats are JN0-664 web-based practice test software, desktop practice test software, and PDF dumps files. All these three TestPassKing JN0-664 Exam Questions format are important and play a crucial role in your Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) exam preparation. With the JN0-664 exam questions you will get updated and error-free JN0-664 exam questions all the time.

Juniper JN0-664 Certification Exam is designed for professionals who are looking to validate their skills and knowledge in the service provider domain. JN0-664 exam is intended for individuals who have a strong understanding of Junos OS, networking fundamentals, and service provider technologies. The JNCIP-SP certification exam is the second level of certification in the Juniper Networks Certified Internet Professional (JNCIP) Service Provider certification track.

Juniper Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) Sample Questions (Q41-Q46):

NEW QUESTION # 41
The network shown in the exhibit is based on IS-IS.

Which statement is correct in this scenario?

  • A. The routers are using unnumbered interfaces.
  • B. The area address is two bytes.
  • C. The system ID of R1_2 is 192.168.16.1.
  • D. The NSEL byte for Area 0001 is 00.

Answer: D


NEW QUESTION # 42
Your network is receiving the 203.0.113.0/24 network using EBGP from AS 64500 and AS 64501.
Both of these advertisements have identical local-preference values, AS-path lengths, and BGP origin codes. You want to influence the way your AS sends traffic to the 203.0.113.0/24 network.
In this scenario, which attribute would you consider next when selecting the best path?

  • A. MED value
  • B. IGP metric
  • C. peer IP address
  • D. router ID

Answer: D

Explanation:
By default, the MED attribute is only compared for routes received from the same neighbouring AS.
The next feasible tiebreaker in the BGP route selection algorithm would be Router ID.


NEW QUESTION # 43
Exhibit

CE-1 must advertise ten subnets to PE-1 using BGP Once CE-1 starts advertising the subnets to PE-1, the BGP peering state changes to Active.
Referring to the CLI output shown in the exhibit, which statement is correct?

  • A. CE-1 is configured with an incorrect peer AS
  • B. The prefix limit has been reached on PE-1
  • C. CE-1 is unreachable
  • D. CE-1 is advertising its entire routing table.

Answer: A

Explanation:
The problem in this scenario is that CE-1 is configured with an incorrect peer AS number for its BGP session with PE-1. The CLI output shows that CE-1 is using AS 65531 as its local AS number and AS 65530 as its peer AS number. However, PE-1 is using AS 65530 as its local AS number and AS 65531 as its peer AS number. This causes a mismatch in the BGP OPEN messages and prevents the BGP session from being established. To solve this problem, CE-1 should configure its peer AS number as 65530 under [edit protocols bgp group external] hierarchy level.


NEW QUESTION # 44
Which three statements about IS-IS in a multi-area network are correct? (Choose three.)

  • A. Internal L1 PDUs are only flooded to the local area's L1 routers.
  • B. Internal L1 PDUs are flooded to all L1 routers in other areas.
  • C. External L2 PDUs are flooded to all L2 routers in other areas.
  • D. Internal L1 PDUs are flooded to the local area's L2 routers.
  • E. External L2 PDUs are only flooded to the local area's L2 routers.

Answer: A,C,D

Explanation:
Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) is a link-state routing protocol designed to move information efficiently within a computer network, a group of physically connected computers or similar devices. It operates in two levels, Level 1 (L1) and Level 2 (L2), and supports hierarchical routing within a multi-area network.
Let's analyze each statement to determine its correctness in the context of IS-IS multi-area networks.
1. **Statement A: Internal L1 PDUs are flooded to the local area's L2 routers.**
- This statement is correct. L1 PDUs (Protocol Data Units) are flooded within the L1 area and also to the L2 routers that are present in the same area. These L2 routers act as the boundary routers that connect the local L1 area to other L1 areas via L2.
2. **Statement B: External L2 PDUs are flooded to all L2 routers in other areas.**
- This statement is correct. L2 PDUs are flooded throughout the entire L2 backbone, which includes all L2 routers in different areas. This ensures that inter-area routing information is shared across the network.
3. **Statement C: Internal L1 PDUs are flooded to all L1 routers in other areas.**
- This statement is incorrect. Internal L1 PDUs are only flooded within the local L1 area. They do not cross L1 area boundaries; inter-area communication is handled by L2 routers.
4. **Statement D: Internal L1 PDUs are only flooded to the local area's L1 routers.**
- This statement is correct. Internal L1 PDUs are indeed only flooded within their local L1 area, and do not go beyond it.
5. **Statement E: External L2 PDUs are only flooded to the local area's L2 routers.**
- This statement is incorrect. External L2 PDUs are flooded to all L2 routers throughout the IS-IS network, not just to those in the local area. This allows L2 routers to maintain a complete map of the network's topology.
**Conclusion**:
Given the analysis, the correct answers are:
**A. Internal L1 PDUs are flooded to the local area's L2 routers.**
**B. External L2 PDUs are flooded to all L2 routers in other areas.**
**D. Internal L1 PDUs are only flooded to the local area's L1 routers.**
**References**:
- Juniper Networks Documentation on IS-IS: [IS-IS
Overview](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/is-is-routing-overview.html)
- RFC 1195, Use of OSI IS-IS for Routing in TCP/IP and Dual Environments: [RFC
1195](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1195) which details the operation of IS-IS in multi-area networks.


NEW QUESTION # 45
Exhibit

The environment is using BGP All devices are in the same AS with reachability redundancy Referring to the exhibit, which statement is correct?

  • A. RR2 is in an OpenConfirm State until RR1 becomes unreachable.
  • B. Client1 is peered to Client2 and Client3.
  • C. Peering is dynamically discovered between all devices.
  • D. RR1 is peered to Client2 and RR2

Answer: D

Explanation:
BGP route reflectors are BGP routers that are allowed to ignore the IBGP loop avoidance rule and advertise IBGP learned routes to other IBGP peers under specific conditions. BGP route reflectors can reduce the number of IBGP sessions and updates in a network by eliminating the need for a full mesh of IBGP peers.
BGP route reflectors can have three types of peerings:
* EBGP neighbor: A BGP router that belongs to a different autonomous system (AS) than the route reflector.
* IBGP client neighbor: An IBGP router that receives reflected routes from the route reflector. A client does not need to peer with other clients or non-clients.
* IBGP non-client neighbor: An IBGP router that does not receive reflected routes from the route reflector. A non-client needs to peer with other non-clients and the route reflector.
In the exhibit, we can see that RR1 and RR2 are route reflectors in the same AS with reachability redundancy.
They have two types of peerings: EBGP neighbors (R1 and R4) and IBGP client neighbors (Client1, Client2, and Client3). RR1 and RR2 are also peered with each other as IBGP non-client neighbors.


NEW QUESTION # 46
......

Examinations JN0-664 Actual Questions: https://www.testpassking.com/JN0-664-exam-testking-pass.html

Report this page